“Chair vs Dair keep having these half-completed debates where someone argues for, the other ship retorts, and then the first ship “gives up” because the retort is “too stupid”. Yet each ship is completely convinced of their arguments. You guys want to have a debate? You’re supposed to defend your argument after the rebuttal! Otherwise [FYI], you’ve been defeated.”
Debate isn’t a war of attrition- you don’t win just by refusing to ever concede. You win by making clear, logical arguments supported by evidence, not by producing a giant wall of text riddled with inaccuracies, misinterpretations, assumptions, personal insults, and statements that are just laughably wrong.
And you know what, maybe you don’t get tired of rehashing the exact same arguments over and over again, but most of us actually do. Why you think it’s the responsibility of Chair fans to “officially rebut” a post consisting entirely of half-cocked arguments that have been made (and responded to) a dozen times already is beyond me. You want rebuttals? Go read through the last four months of my posts. Almost every point made in your official “Why Dair is Teh Awesome” post has already been disproven, in some capacity, on this blog. I have neither the time nor the patience to compile it all and repeat myself for the umpteenth time just so you can feel like your POV was validated.
I would, however, like to take one last opportunity to LOL at any argument that dismisses the events of 5x24 as irrelevant simply because they contradict your opinion.
Fact: Chuck makes Blair happier than Dan.
And no rambling wall of text about how Dan is flawless and selfless and lurves Blair oh so very much is going to change that.